How To Put Stayfree Movies

Agent 007: Casino Royale

Well if not I can talk about the last film in the room so why not go and fish out those who now also have a certain age.
And to begin, start with a good film certainly unique!

I love the Agent 007. I love him for his nonchalance throughout the UK, his savoir-farie and his incredible inventions and gadgets such as that found cinematic (as an R Moore who forget the parachute with the Union Jack or is a chase between the canals of Venice? ES Connery who sees the enemy in the eyes of the woman who is kissing? Tell me a little when in kissing someone you have noticed what is reflected in the eyes of the beloved ....... If we try to look at other object of desire that we see a monster movie horror !!!!)

So just why I love them all except the Bond Timothy Dalton and Daniel Craig. The First American because TROOOOOPPOOOO to be a British agent and surrenders to revenge, and the second one too flippant and sometimes a little too realistic. I do not care to see suffer or lose the agent 007, I already know who should win! The beauty is not the realism, but the absurd suspension of reality is reached.

So in this light, the square at the top Casino Royale, the first one I do not recommend that the 1966 version of the sad forty years later.
In this film, very little espionage and slapstick comedy directed by John Houston, there is an elderly but very well preserved, James Bond played by David Niven in service that is invoked against a spy agency that relies on the weak point of the secret agents the bond-girl.
The film certainly does not shine for its originality, positioning or anything else but for its full absurdity.

James Bond, in addition to that Niven, so are Woody Allen and Peter Sellers (including the three by far the most appropriate, would not disfigured in the series canonina). We find the forbidden fruit of love between Bond and Mata Hari, Mata Bond played by Joanna Pettet, while a young Barbara Bouchet is the daughter of Money Penny who took over as secretary to M, and there's the legendary bond inifine number-one-girl Ursula Andress.
the end, the film is taking a ride around, exaggerating more than the already large excesses of the Bond films. Unfortunately, as I said, the film suffers badly in the assembly (there are a number of scenes held together by good will of the viewer more than anything else), but in the end the pace and holds the film is definitely watch again and again, even if a certain amount of solution of continuity